Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 104%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '19 at 18:23
Run Duration260 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$166
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 91.1
1-Core 144
2-Core 287
96% 174 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 756
76% 618 Pts
64-Core 793
49% 793 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Asus(1043 8661) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 149
Reflection 153
Parallax 149
121% 150 fps
MRender 172
Gravity 137
Splatting 100
108% 136 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 113%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1592 1028 608 609 608 607 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,312
Write 1,576
Mixed 439
SusWrite 842
234% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 170
4K Mixed 63.4
206% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,004
DQ Write 1,339
DQ Mixed 888
750% 1,077 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 220%
Great: 254%
Edge NextGen SSD 500GB
191GB free
Firmware: SVN139B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1544 1550 1561 1549 1563 402 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
335% Outstanding
Read 2,424
Write 1,502
Mixed 1,104
SusWrite 1,362
356% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 66.4
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 96.4
330% 121 MB/s
DQ Read 1,249
DQ Write 1,101
DQ Mixed 983
789% 1,111 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 335%
Great: 335%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174
1.5TB free
Firmware: 81.H0A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 160 167 171 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
99.2% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 176
Mixed 73
SusWrite 166
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 0.6
211% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.2%
Great: 113%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 146 149 150 152 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 143
Write 142
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 149
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 144 146 148 147 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
94.8% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 162
Mixed 99
SusWrite 147
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.8%
Great: 101%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 168 167 169 170 170 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 163
Mixed 99.3
SusWrite 168
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 101%
USB DISK 2.0 1GB
1GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 4.2 4.2 5 5.2 4.8 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Read 30
Write 12.8
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.5
14% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3733 C17 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 23.4
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 24.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS IX EXTREME Builds (Compare 390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 106%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS IX EXTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $571
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback