Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 01 '20 at 18:00
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570-$99
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Memory 93
1-Core 108
2-Core 209
79% 137 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 390
54% 398 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.96% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 7.12
3% 6 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 2.47
Splatting 8.26
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.96%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 830 64GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM03B1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 97 92 87 80 84 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 478
Write 161
Mixed 210
SusWrite 92.8
52% 235 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 18.7
82% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 280
DQ Write 49.3
DQ Mixed 87
84% 139 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 63%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31
355GB free
Firmware: DEM9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 107 106 107 107 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 117
Write 98.8
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 107
71% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 2.1
395% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-001.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,036 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback