Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3V  (all builds)
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130425
Uptime19.7 Days
Run DateMay 08 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G2030 @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
56.5% Above average
Memory 85.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 164
66% 111 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 154
22% 159 Pts
64-Core 151
9% 151 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.62% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 1.07
Splatting 3.35
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.62%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 170 143 150 145 143 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
63.5% Good
Read 238
Write 240
Mixed 228
SusWrite 159
49% 216 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 34.1
113% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 198
149% 199 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
6GB free
Firmware: CC47
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 189
Write 166
Mixed 91.2
110% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5584-001.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 4.2
17% 5.83 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 3.7
15% 5.17 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B75M-D3V Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback