| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 1.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | HP Z620 Workstation (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 158A |
| Memory | 13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20120717 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 24 '20 at 19:42 |
| Run Duration | 114 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2609 0
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
|
52.9%
Above average
|
53% 86.8 Pts
|
24% 189 Pts
|
14% 227 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia NVS 300
HP(103C 0862) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
|
1.06%
Terrible
|
1% 1.22 fps
|
1% 1.74 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 104 91 95 105 101 MB/s
|
46.5%
Average
|
38% 168 MB/s
|
84% 30.7 MB/s
|
71% 112 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Micron 36JSF1G72PZ-1G4K1 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz
|
38.1%
Below average
|
38% 13.4 GB/s
|
27% 9.43 GB/s
|
45% 88.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,479 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP Z620 Workstation
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples | 157x |
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 155x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 135x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 178x |
| Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples | 115x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 97x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |