Asus Maximus III Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus Maximus III Formula  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121019
Uptime22 Days
Run DateJan 09 '17 at 20:06
Run Duration120 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 860-$320
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 92.5
1-Core 83
2-Core 156
67% 110 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 378
41% 326 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 2767) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 28.2
Parallax 40.7
26% 33.6 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 37.1
Splatting 31.9
29% 36.4 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ocz-octane S2 256GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.13 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 120
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 9.19
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 6.14
38% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 10.9
DQ Write 43.4
DQ Mixed 5.23
10% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
877GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 167
Mixed 144
120% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.37
143% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
25.6% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 8.8
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 63
64% 63 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus III Formula Builds (Compare 133 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Maximus III Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $548
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback