Today's hottest deals

Samsung 760XBE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 90% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemSamsung 760XBE  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NT760XBE-X79
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190610
Uptime14.9 Days
Run DateMar 28 '20 at 11:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 59%
CPU Throttled 90%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 55.7
1-Core 62.1
2-Core 96.2
44% 71.3 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 224
27% 206 Pts
64-Core 268
17% 268 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620
Sanyo(144D C822) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7324
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Lighting 4.77
Reflection 45.9
Parallax 4.78
4% 18.5 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 4.27
Splatting 7.22
4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB512HAJQ-000 512GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA73K1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 307 295 282 273 266 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 1,064
Write 706
Mixed 826
SusWrite 314
162% 728 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 40
141% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 246
DQ Mixed 289
215% 287 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 118%
Great: 276%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 500GB
179GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 253 224 230 300 276 331 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
45.6% Average
Read 224
Write 225
Mixed 219
SusWrite 269
53% 234 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 20.8
4K Mixed 14
48% 15.7 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 31
48% 91.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
32.5% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 11
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 6.8
SC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.53 GB/s
Latency 141
28% 141 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 760XBE Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 760XBE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback