Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive271% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 01 '20 at 00:48
Run Duration226 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 2920X
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
80% 150 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 1,010
90% 761 Pts
64-Core 1,918
119% 1,918 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
EVGA(3842 2070) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 121
Parallax 123
106% 125 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 123
Splatting 98.8
104% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 3 1TB
805GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2358 2188 1158 1170 1166 1171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
271% Outstanding
Read 2,194
Write 2,318
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 1,535
416% 1,852 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 88.9
4K Mixed 55.4
185% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 616
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 748
556% 726 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 271%
Great: 332%
Amd-raid SanDisk SSD PLUS 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: UG50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 119 284 263 262 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 298
Write 353
Mixed 263
SusWrite 258
66% 293 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 31
4K Mixed 10.5
49% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 55.3
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 25
37% 66.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 46%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3793 1875 3263 3075 3052 3133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
260% Outstanding
Read 66.5
Write 1291
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 3032
259% 1,119 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 36.2
123% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 745
DQ Write 799
DQ Mixed 832
610% 792 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 260%
Great: 422%
Jmicron H/W RAID0 36TB
21.5TB free
Firmware: 0103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 15 16 15 14 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.5% Very poor
Read 23.5
Write 14.5
Mixed 21.3
SusWrite 16.6
14% 19 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.1
29% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
126% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 50.7
MC Mixed 48.9
143% 49.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 21.8
64% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $1,135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback