Today's hottest deals

AMD 990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive27.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAMD 990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 19 '17 at 23:00
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6100-$68
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 50
2-Core 79.8
42% 64.7 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 263
29% 231 Pts
64-Core 265
16% 265 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adaptec Array 120GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 288
Write 120
Mixed 155
41% 188 MB/s
4K Read 7.51
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 5.79
25% 8.08 MB/s
DQ Read 33.8
DQ Write 23.9
DQ Mixed 10.4
13% 22.7 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 75%
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
848GB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Adaptec Array 1.5TB
809GB free
Firmware: V1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD WD2502ABYS-02B7A0 251GB
138GB free
Firmware: 02.03B03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 100
Write 99.7
Mixed 98.1
75% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 2.17
4K Mixed 0.44
118% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4 F3-14900CL9-4 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 Corsair CMZ8GX3M2A186 16GB
800, 800, 667, 667 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.7% Average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: AMD 990FXA-UD3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback