Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191113
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 19:47
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 85.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 243
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 800
74% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,297
80% 1,297 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170
XFX(1682 9C30) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
75.7% Very good
Lighting 88.5
Reflection 84.3
Parallax 127
72% 100 fps
MRender 82.5
Gravity 94.8
Splatting 118
83% 98.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MG04ACA400N 4TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJ2B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 148 141 142 152 157 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Read 169
Write 182
Mixed 103
SusWrite 149
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.9
233% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 113%
WD WD2502ABYS-02B7A0 251GB
17GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 75.8
Write 63.3
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 29.4
41% 55.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 64%
WD WD3202ABYS-02B7A0 320GB
57GB free
Firmware: 02.03B02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 30 30 30 29 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 70
Write 68.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 30
41% 55.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 61%
Hitachi HTS725050A7E630 500GB-$125
42GB free
Firmware: GH2OA420
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 63 62 61 64 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 68.5
Write 75.5
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 63.1
41% 56.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$192
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 37.8
MC Mixed 32.6
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 29.5
93% 32.6 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 106%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X470-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,505 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF X470-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback