Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 06:06
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$314
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 150
2-Core 291
92% 172 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,202
108% 910 Pts
64-Core 2,186
135% 2,186 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.48
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.6% Excellent
Lighting 101
Reflection 114
Parallax 96.5
82% 104 fps
MRender 98.3
Gravity 95.8
Splatting 100
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 281 254 200 186 189 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
Read 498
Write 439
Mixed 391
SusWrite 246
88% 394 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 54.6
4K Mixed 45.5
149% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 175
127% 168 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 124%
LSI MR9260-8i 1TB
500GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 35 35 35 36 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 291
Write 34.1
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 35.2
22% 103 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.8
8% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 92%
LSI MR9260-8i 18TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.2 8.4 9.4 9.8 10 9.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 16% Great: 51%
LSI MR9260-8i 639GB
533GB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 41 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.5% Very good
Read 230
Write 19.1
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 39.9
60% 82.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
190% 1.13 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3200C16-32GTZN 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
93% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 33.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 32
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS PRO WIFI Builds (Compare 2,292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 161%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 162%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS PRO WIFI - $274

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $1,228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback