Today's hottest deals

Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory29.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 15 '20 at 08:15
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$149
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 228
77% 140 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 817
77% 637 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.1% Below average
Lighting 44.9
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 43.4
37% 40.2 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 37.5
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
414GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 829 422 331 491 463 463 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 2,159
Write 2,089
Mixed 1,326
SusWrite 500
339% 1,518 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 41.9
152% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 493
DQ Write 474
DQ Mixed 487
365% 485 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 185%
Great: 271%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
129GB free
Firmware: VB41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 125 84 104 93 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 831
Write 148
Mixed 208
SusWrite 109
70% 324 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 42.8
108% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 150
DQ Mixed 93.2
92% 147 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83%
Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
182GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 9.5 9.9 7.5 6.4 7.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 30.6
Write 7.5
Mixed 13.6
SusWrite 8.6
11% 15.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
68% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB
57GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 49 50 55 53 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 67.4
Write 54.3
Mixed 21.9
SusWrite 51.4
35% 48.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
266GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 108 106 126 125 126 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 126
Write 129
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 116
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
446GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 100 101 101 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 102
Write 92.8
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 99.3
65% 88.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
76GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 21 22 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 57.2
Write 10.8
Mixed 15.4
SusWrite 20.6
19% 26 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
76% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 DDR4 2666 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
MC Read 35.4
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 31.7
96% 33.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 34.8
SC Mixed 29.8
86% 30 GB/s
Latency 89.4
45% 89.4 ns
Poor: 93%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 653 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $659
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback