Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive221% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 09:29
Run Duration261 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 72.9
1-Core 111
2-Core 228
75% 137 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 724
71% 583 Pts
64-Core 1,253
78% 1,253 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Lighting 45.3
Reflection 32.3
Parallax 39.2
37% 39 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.6
32% 39.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 629 503 444 461 472 464 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
221% Outstanding
Read 2,846
Write 2,098
Mixed 1,362
SusWrite 495
377% 1,700 MB/s
4K Read 36.3
4K Write 73.9
4K Mixed 47.3
155% 52.5 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 492
411% 588 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 221%
Great: 271%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
134GB free
Firmware: VB41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 115 130 117 114 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 1,043
Mixed 866
SusWrite 161
169% 756 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 42.5
139% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 581
DQ Mixed 323
267% 369 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 109%
Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
186GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 6.1 4.7 4.7 7.4 6.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.37% Terrible
Read 19.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5.8
6% 8.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
57% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.37%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 49 54 51 52 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 73.1
Write 57.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 50.6
37% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
40GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 119 123 129 128 129 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
71% Very good
Read 126
Write 109
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 121
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 71%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
29GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 87 89 92 92 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 80
Write 79.6
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 88.1
53% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
137GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 19 20 20 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 83.1
Write 45.5
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 18.2
34% 46.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
111% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 27.7
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 26.7
79% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback