Asrock X370 Taichi

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock X370 Taichi  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190627
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '20 at 01:08
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 74.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 835
77% 646 Pts
64-Core 1,256
78% 1,256 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 80%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.3
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 38.7
36% 38.3 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 42.6
Splatting 37.4
32% 39.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 511GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 620 433 465 462 462 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 2,960
Write 2,122
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 484
390% 1,759 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 76.6
4K Mixed 48.4
161% 54.5 MB/s
DQ Read 555
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 484
396% 560 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 225%
Great: 271%
Amd-raid XPG SPECTRIX S40 256GB
5GB free
Firmware: VB41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,261
Write 1098
Mixed 969
247% 1,110 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 75.6
4K Mixed 42.8
142% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 637
DQ Mixed 300
264% 379 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 180%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
274GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 2.5 2.6 2.7 2.5 2.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 18.2
Write 3.3
Mixed 3
SusWrite 2.7
5% 6.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 72%
Amd-raid HDS722020ALA330 2TB
16GB free
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 51 57 57 57 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 66
Write 59.8
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 53.7
37% 50.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1
167% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 50%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
130GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 66 75 75 74 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 75.2
Write 61.5
Mixed 41.9
SusWrite 69.9
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid Hitachi HUA72302 2TB
81GB free
Firmware: MK7O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 82 96 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Read 87.2
Write 88.5
Mixed 46.2
SusWrite 88.8
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 77%
Amd-raid ST2000DL003-9VT1 2TB
69GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 51 71 74 70 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
44.9% Average
Read 92.9
Write 55.4
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 63.7
46% 62.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 CMK16GX4M2A2666C16 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.9
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 27.6
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Taichi Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Taichi - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,007
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback