PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus M5A97 R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20150626 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | May 25 '20 at 17:51 |
Run Duration | 203 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
59.7%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
28.9%
Poor
|
||||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
395GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 282 303 300 293 296 MB/s
|
62.3%
Good
|
|||
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
82GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 208 198 196 197 193 MB/s
|
53.4%
Above average
|
|||
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
112GB free
Firmware: UE5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 161 90 95 94 94 MB/s
|
36%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 111 110 111 110 109 MB/s
|
61.7%
Good
|
|||
ExcelSto r Technology J81 165GB
148GB free, PID fcfe
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 26 26 25 25 MB/s
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Elements 2TB
558GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 26 27 26 25 25 MB/s
|
13.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 866x |
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 645x |
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 438x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 186x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 160x |
RX 480AMD $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples | 119x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $353 |