Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics9.89% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 01 '15 at 10:57
Run Duration389 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$150
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 198
61% 139 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 552
56% 454 Pts
64-Core 547
34% 547 Pts
Poor: 59% Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8427) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4448
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10.7
Parallax 12.9
9% 11.7 fps
MRender 15.1
Gravity 10.3
Splatting 14.7
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Richdisk device 236GB
22GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
17.1% Very poor
Read 88.5
Write 61.4
Mixed 73.6
17% 74.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 9.33
4K Mixed 6.91
31% 9.22 MB/s
DQ Read 12.4
DQ Write 10.7
DQ Mixed 6.25
6% 9.78 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 18%
Richdisk device 344GB
20GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
16% Very poor
Read 82
Write 62.4
Mixed 67.8
16% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 9.38
4K Write 9.71
4K Mixed 6.53
28% 8.54 MB/s
DQ Read 12.7
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 6.97
7% 10.2 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16%
Great: 16%
Richdisk device 236GB
18GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 75.4
Write 64.3
Mixed 74.2
16% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 9.89
4K Mixed 5.63
28% 8.71 MB/s
DQ Read 9.82
DQ Write 9.98
DQ Mixed 5.47
5% 8.42 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 18%
Richdisk device 268GB
17GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 78.8
Write 62
Mixed 69.7
16% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 9.77
4K Mixed 6.95
29% 8.94 MB/s
DQ Read 12.3
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 6.76
6% 9.8 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 23%
Richdisk device 268GB
7GB free
Firmware: 1010
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 79.6
Write 63.1
Mixed 74.6
16% 72.4 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 9.16
4K Mixed 6.77
29% 8.72 MB/s
DQ Read 11.9
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 6.84
6% 9.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 23%
Richdisk device 215GB
31GB free
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Richdisk device 43GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1010
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 42%
Apacer AS710 128GB
69GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.9% Poor
Read 32.9
Write 28.1
Mixed 30
38% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.53
4K Write 5.76
4K Mixed 3.34
330% 4.88 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 153%
Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 959 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $451
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback