Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H V2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191202
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 12:46
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
Memory 79.5
1-Core 115
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 648
68% 544 Pts
64-Core 894
55% 894 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (44th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44% Average
Lighting 52.4
Reflection 65
Parallax 69.9
43% 62.4 fps
MRender 64.5
Gravity 53.6
Splatting 54.2
47% 57.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 44%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$57
190GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF220400
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 126 131 120 117 119 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 448
Write 379
Mixed 316
SusWrite 150
72% 324 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 43.1
4K Mixed 11.6
72% 25.7 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 32.1
44% 80.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
274GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 73 74 68 74 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 89.9
Write 50.7
Mixed 39.3
SusWrite 72.2
46% 63 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.1
43% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 109%
SAMSUNG HM500JI 500GB
6GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 8.9 9.1 9.2 9.2 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
4.09% Terrible
Read 4.8
Write 10.8
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 9.8
12% 8.23 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.09%
Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
46.9% Average
MC Read 18
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.5
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF Builds (Compare 1,542 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H V2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $302
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback