Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 16% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	2.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8559U 2,379 User benchmarks, average bench 78% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 0.4 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Memory 14 1-Core 12 2-Core 22.7 10% 16.2 Pts	4-Core 38.7 8-Core 57.2 6% 48 Pts	64-Core 57.4 4% 57.4 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655 8,316 User benchmarks, average bench 9% Intel(8086 2074) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.8141 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	2.93% Terrible	Lighting 3.43 Reflection 2.96 Parallax 3.44 3% 3.28 fps	MRender 3.19 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.78 3% 3.76 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 2.93% Great: 10%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
P10C 512GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 178% 432GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0614B0G SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 903 916 794 853 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 1,019 Write 878 Mixed 771 SusWrite 784 194% 863 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 27.4 4K Mixed 17.6 63% 20.7 MB/s	DQ Read 105 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 96.9 72% 95.2 MB/s
Poor: 112% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 212%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT16G4SFD8266.M16FJ 2x16GB 1,022 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24% Poor	MC Read 8 MC Write 9 MC Mixed 11.5 27% 9.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.8 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 368 11% 368 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples	1,622x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	7x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	6x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $69Bench 275%, 495,311 samples	79x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $104Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	49x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	47x

RAM
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 5,229 samples	62x
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 78%, 5,327 samples	54x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples	35x

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $69