Today's hottest deals

Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (97%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 16 '20 at 21:10
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 97%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$83
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 507
8-Core 734
78% 621 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1266 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.5% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 62.2
41% 59.3 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 54.2
42% 51.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
198GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 201 197 209 227 206 MB/s
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.7% Above average
Read 206
Write 140
Mixed 140
SusWrite 206
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 23.9
83% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 182
DQ Mixed 110
103% 160 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
466GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 125 125 125 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 127
Write 109
Mixed 69.1
SusWrite 125
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 69%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 141 142 139 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 136
Write 141
Mixed 83.3
SusWrite 140
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 85%
General UDisk 64GB
55GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21.4
Mixed 4.2
10% 12.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
44% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1140CH.001 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.9% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 15
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 16
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B365M Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,080 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $372
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback