Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME B350-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B350-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180419
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 19 '20 at 21:59
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 653
66% 535 Pts
64-Core 885
55% 885 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 71.2
Parallax 85.7
56% 75.3 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 69
Splatting 58.2
53% 66.3 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS120G2G0B-00EPW0 120GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UI190000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 32 43 31 39 46 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 331
Write 62.1
Mixed 9
SusWrite 39.8
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 16.5
60% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 63.5
DQ Mixed 41.5
44% 73.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 52%
WDC WDS1 20G2G0A-00JH30 120GB
77GB free
Firmware: UE30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 54 49 67 46 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.1% Poor
Read 103
Write 77.2
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 58.4
18% 79.6 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 18.8
4K Mixed 18.2
60% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.4
DQ Write 19.9
DQ Mixed 19.4
14% 19.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 53%
WD RE4 1TB (2010)-$50
781GB free
Firmware: 00.0NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 113 113 113 112 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 106
SusWrite 113
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
328GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 94 94 94 93 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 56.5
Write 8.5
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 91.6
32% 43.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
496GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 95 95 95 95 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 88.1
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 94.8
59% 80.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 55%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 136 135 136 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 136
Write 128
Mixed 101
SusWrite 135
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 85%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
30GB free, PID 125c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
17.4% Very poor
Read 20.8
Write 15.2
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 15.8
23% 17.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 4.1
267% 4.37 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 17.4%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 BLS8G4D30BESBK.8FD BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FD2 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 22
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 25.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 92.1
43% 92.1 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME B350-PLUS Builds (Compare 4,465 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B350-PLUS - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $437
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback