Acer Aspire V3-571G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.51% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Aspire V3-571G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA50_HC_CR
Memory10 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130311
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMar 04 '17 at 16:20
Run Duration88 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3230M-$100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.8% Above average
Memory 81.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 161
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 213
28% 211 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M
Acer(1025 0648) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.717
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.51% Terrible
Lighting 5.73
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 5.06
5% 5.32 fps
MRender 7.95
Gravity 8.8
Splatting 9.13
7% 8.63 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75
814GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
51.7% Above average
Read 89.9
Write 89.9
Mixed 90.3
68% 90 MB/s
4K Read 0.51
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.22
86% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 51.7%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G ACR16D3LS1KBG/8G 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
54.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 17.5
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 77.6
52% 77.6 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-571G Builds (Compare 1,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-571G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback