Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 45% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 37% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Gigabyte H310M A 2.0
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 07 '20 at 09:18
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-9100F-$135 34,310 User benchmarks, average bench 80% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 132 2-Core 254 90% 160 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 507 68% 506 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 3FCA) CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.48 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	44.5% Average	Lighting 57.5 Reflection 53.8 Parallax 52.8 47% 54.7 fps	MRender 45.4 Gravity 50.6 Splatting 49.4 40% 48.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB 4,915 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: HC8110B SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 298 368 415 417 385 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 474 Write 389 Mixed 283 SusWrite 374 85% 380 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 40.9 156% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 357 DQ Write 238 DQ Mixed 191 171% 262 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 103%
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$55 30,952 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 698GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 96.8 Write 91.7 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 96.2 62% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 54%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 2x4GB 12,708 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	MC Read 27.8 MC Write 29.5 MC Mixed 22 76% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29 SC Mixed 22.2 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M A 2.0-CF Builds (Compare 540 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 62%

Destroyer

Desktop 88%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 52%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M A 2.0-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $95Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	201x
Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	80x
Core i7-9700FIntel $289Bench 92%, 54,980 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples	43x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	41x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	32x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	15x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x
SSD 240GBGigabyte $33Bench 73%, 20,238 samples	12x

RAM
DDR4 3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 81%, 16,423 samples	37x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	14x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 79% - Very good

Total price: $371

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16