Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (97th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 3 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 08 '20 at 10:34
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 93.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 437
8-Core 458
59% 448 Pts
64-Core 460
28% 460 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6950-$290
Gigabyte(1458 21FD) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Lighting 27.7
Reflection 23.9
Parallax 26.8
23% 26.1 fps
MRender 22.4
Gravity 24.5
Splatting 30.9
22% 25.9 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ae100 120GB 120GB
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 49.5
Write 255
Mixed 13.2
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 14.8
44% 13.2 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 4.8
20% 47.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
130GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 190 172 191 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 199
Write 142
Mixed 87.7
SusWrite 185
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 04EF ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
67.6% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.1
67% 23.4 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 21.6
59% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 61
66% 61 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback