Asrock Z77 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive33.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130711
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 17:04
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.3% Excellent
Memory 93.9
1-Core 116
2-Core 232
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 454
8-Core 462
61% 458 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 86.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
ASRock(1849 0162) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5129
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 3% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ae100 120GB 120GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 78 58 44 61 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 419
Write 245
Mixed 219
SusWrite 65
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 12.7
4K Mixed 14.5
26% 9.23 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 14.2
DQ Mixed 24.8
31% 58.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$24
109GB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 188 176 188 192 187 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 162
Mixed 86.2
SusWrite 185
115% 158 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102
50GB free
Firmware: 3.AAK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 76 76 76 76 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42% Average
Read 70.5
Write 47.9
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 75.5
45% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 42%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 04EF ZEUS-1600 04CD F3-2400C10-4GTX 16GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 24.8
MC Mixed 22.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 19.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 4,055 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Extreme4 - $158

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $488
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback