HP EliteBook 8560w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.59% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive84.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8560w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1631
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 17 '20 at 22:50
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2620M
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 84.8
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 148
64% 106 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 213
28% 209 Pts
64-Core 210
13% 210 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6700M
HP(103C 1631) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.31
Parallax 6.53
7% 7.71 fps
MRender 8.48
Gravity 5.83
Splatting 8.39
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingmax 480G 480GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: .4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 362 361 411 410 414 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 442
Write 430
Mixed 421
SusWrite 397
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 29.2
106% 35 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 266
192% 244 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
51.4% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.1
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.1
55% 72.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 51.4%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8560w Builds (Compare 471 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8560w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback