Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics78.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X399 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 20 '20 at 23:06
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 77.5
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 722
74% 596 Pts
64-Core 1,892
117% 1,892 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$449
Gigabyte(1458 36CB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
78.5% Very good
Lighting 98.5
Reflection 106
Parallax 108
80% 104 fps
MRender 91
Gravity 95.3
Splatting 89.4
75% 91.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Goodram C100 240GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S8FM06.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 96 227 24 24 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 425
Write 242
Mixed 73.7
SusWrite 92
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 21
4K Mixed 11.2
40% 13.9 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 21.4
DQ Mixed 30.3
31% 53.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 83%
Toshiba HDWD240 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: KQ000A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 172 169 169 171 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
20.1% Poor
Read 190
Write 167
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 172
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.6
7% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 28
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 25.2
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 85.2
47% 85.2 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS PRO-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,267
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback