| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 86.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| System | HP ProBook 650 G1 (all builds) |
| Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 1993 |
| Memory | 3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140429 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 10 '20 at 10:57 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
63.2%
Good
|
68% 116 Pts
|
32% 237 Pts
|
15% 235 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
HP(103C 1993) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 9.18.10.3324
|
4.42%
Terrible
|
4% 5.9 fps
|
5% 5.89 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 137 115 111 90 80 MB/s
|
86.6%
Excellent
|
77% 345 MB/s
|
164% 60.4 MB/s
|
104% 165 MB/s
|
|
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB
22GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.2 8.3 9.1 8.6 8.4 9 MB/s
|
15.2%
Very poor
|
16% 13.8 MB/s
|
208% 3.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5469-045.A00LF HP16D3LS1KFG/4G 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
53.9%
Above average
|
53% 18.7 GB/s
|
46% 16 GB/s
|
56% 71.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical ProBook 650 G1 Builds (Compare 226 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: HP ProBook 650 G1
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4210MIntelBench 51%, 15,981 samples | 71x |
| Core i5-4200MIntel $39Bench 50%, 33,019 samples | 38x |
| Core i5-4300MIntel $264Bench 51%, 13,678 samples | 28x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples | 222x |
| Radeon HD 8750MAMDBench 6%, 409 samples | 2x |
| HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 22% - Poor | Total price: $28 |