Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20205

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.92% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemLenovo 20205  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20205
Memory0.7 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 15 '20 at 11:08
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium A1018
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 76.6
1-Core 56.9
2-Core 97.4
50% 77 Pts
4-Core 100
8-Core 106
14% 103 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Legend(17AA 5011) 607MB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.3329
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.92% Terrible
Lighting 2.37
Reflection 1.46
Parallax 1.22
2% 1.68 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.93
Splatting 2.91
2% 2.25 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.92%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2500LPCX-24C6HT0 250GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 41 57 38 47 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 74
Write 75.8
Mixed 39
SusWrite 47.2
43% 59 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
121% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 57%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
6GB free, PID 558a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 4.9 4.4 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 13.3
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 8.7
21% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
30.4% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 7.6
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20205 Builds (Compare 68 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20205

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback