Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 80M2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 9%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 80M2  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Paris G 4A6
Memory0.5 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150826
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '20 at 06:54
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3050
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
21.1% Poor
Memory 37.9
1-Core 12.2
2-Core 19.9
18% 23.3 Pts
4-Core 27
8-Core 29.2
4% 28.1 Pts
64-Core 25.9
2% 25.9 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 27%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
Legend(17AA 3904) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
1.56% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 2
1% 1.47 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 4
2% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.56%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 10 17 26 23 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Read 6.7
Write 12
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 17.7
8% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.1
18% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 61%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
4GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.4 2.9 3.2 3.3 2.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
3.11% Terrible
Read 12.5
Write 0.8
Mixed 2.8
SusWrite 2.8
5% 4.72 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.11%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5674QH0-YK0 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
7.38% Terrible
MC Read 1.4
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 1.6
7% 2.37 GB/s
SC Read 1.8
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0
4% 1.33 GB/s
Latency 212
19% 212 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.38%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80M2 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 21%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80M2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $23
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback