Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 101%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics97.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive158% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateSep 25 '20 at 19:30
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$297
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 93.4
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 583
8-Core 1,074
99% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,062
66% 1,062 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$270
HP(103C 8702) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 452.06
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
97.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 113
Parallax 116
98% 116 fps
MRender 168
Gravity 106
Splatting 93.7
97% 122 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNW512G8H 512GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 416 33 66 35 30 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
158% Outstanding
Read 1,362
Write 922
Mixed 872
SusWrite 120
182% 819 MB/s
4K Read 53.4
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 67.4
231% 80.6 MB/s
DQ Read 331
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 220
259% 434 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 158%
Great: 203%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$57
532GB free
Firmware: MX4OAC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 104 104 103 103 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 170
Write 171
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 104
86% 119 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 108%
Rsh-319 ASM1153E 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 40 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 36.1
Write 26
Mixed 31
SusWrite 40.7
25% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.4
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 31.4
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 61.1
66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $288
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback