Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	83.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2 1,386 User benchmarks, average bench 64% SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	56.3% Above average	Memory 49 1-Core 69.6 2-Core 142 48% 87 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 674 60% 507 Pts	64-Core 1,688 104% 1,688 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 450 256GB-$206 409 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 440 442 437 442 439 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Read 395 Write 427 Mixed 317 SusWrite 436 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 45.4 4K Mixed 26.2 87% 30.3 MB/s	DQ Read 314 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 288 226% 311 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 105%
OCZ Vertex 450 256GB-$206 409 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 235GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 440 442 437 441 439 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	Read 395 Write 422 Mixed 319 SusWrite 441 89% 394 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 46 4K Mixed 28.5 90% 31.2 MB/s	DQ Read 318 DQ Write 327 DQ Mixed 278 222% 308 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70BH0- 1x16GB 169 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.2% Average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 9.4 SC Write 3.7 SC Mixed 4.3 17% 5.8 GB/s	Latency 164 24% 164 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 43%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 40%

Speed boat

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	140x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	112x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	90x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 4x4GBSamsungBench 89%, 2,611 samples	198x
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	190x
M393B1K70DH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 91%, 1,639 samples	82x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $158

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16