Today's hottest deals

Asrock X99 Extreme6/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme6/ac  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateOct 24 '20 at 09:55
Run Duration269 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 209
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 748
74% 606 Pts
64-Core 938
58% 938 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$234
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 90.3
Parallax 93.2
82% 94.5 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 82.3
Splatting 77.9
75% 94.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2019)-$40
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,766
Write 1,462
Mixed 1,287
334% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 49.9
184% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 801
DQ Write 532
DQ Mixed 732
528% 688 MB/s
Poor: 143% Great: 238%
Jmicron Generic 240GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 35 129 30 66 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.2% Below average
Read 352
Write 310
Mixed 185
SusWrite 89.3
52% 234 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 18.4
4K Mixed 7.9
44% 14.2 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 67.5
DQ Mixed 40.5
42% 68.5 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 69%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
59GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 273 257 236 215 200 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 433
Mixed 388
SusWrite 261
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 82.4
4K Mixed 42
145% 51.8 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 349
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 124%
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
49GB free
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 198 198 201 197 193 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
71.3% Very good
Read 310
Write 250
Mixed 266
SusWrite 192
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 29.8
117% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 234
DQ Mixed 156
144% 222 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 217 220 219 218 220 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 158
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 217
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 105%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x4GB-$234
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 42.5
MC Mixed 37.4
115% 40.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 21.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 104%
Great: 117%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme6/ac Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback