Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200401
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 29 '20 at 15:47
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Memory 71.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 296
91% 172 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 826
81% 666 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 457.09
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.6% Average
Lighting 53.3
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 51.1
43% 55.7 fps
MRender 77.8
Gravity 54.4
Splatting 71.1
56% 67.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
253GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 368 368 372 371 372 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 509
Write 361
Mixed 323
SusWrite 370
87% 391 MB/s
4K Read 33.6
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 45.5
169% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 226
182% 255 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 107%
Great: 126%
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
73GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 441 444 443 445 444 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 480
Write 447
Mixed 317
SusWrite 443
95% 422 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 83.2
4K Mixed 40.5
146% 52.3 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 120
112% 173 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 100%
Great: 110%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
794GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 444 454 455 457 457 457 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 447
Mixed 443
SusWrite 454
104% 461 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 95.3
4K Mixed 55.9
184% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 199
150% 200 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 114%
Great: 133%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 110 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 91.2
Write 84.4
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 110
66% 89.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 32GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.7
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 29.3
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 98
41% 98 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,928 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $1,015
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback