Asrock B450M Pro4-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F  (all builds)
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191216
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateNov 03 '20 at 05:38
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$76
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 77
1-Core 140
2-Core 265
87% 160 Pts
4-Core 478
8-Core 788
77% 633 Pts
64-Core 929
58% 929 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 83%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.09
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
72.2% Very good
Lighting 95.2
Reflection 86.6
Parallax 83.4
78% 88.4 fps
MRender 72.8
Gravity 78
Splatting 75.2
62% 75.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7KM1T9HAJM-000MV 2TB
785GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GXM00M3Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 408 417 411 434 436 442 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
107% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 422
Mixed 389
SusWrite 424
96% 426 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 87.1
4K Mixed 44.6
146% 53.3 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 364
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 107%
Great: 117%
Crucial MTFDDAK960TDS 960GB
419GB free
Firmware: D3MS000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 449 451 464 471 476 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 320
Write 447
Mixed 324
SusWrite 460
88% 388 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 38.6
148% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 310
234% 309 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 106%
Crucial MTFDDAV240TCB 240GB
217GB free
Firmware: D0DE008
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 248 244 251 252 253 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 442
Write 255
Mixed 220
SusWrite 249
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 32.9
145% 58.3 MB/s
DQ Read 250
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 207
167% 236 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x8GB-$38
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.3% Very good
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 30.3
80% 28 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 26.5
65% 22.7 GB/s
Latency 86.3
46% 86.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F Builds (Compare 1,956 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $309
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback