Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 190%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 190%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics185% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive321% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory56.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191218
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '20 at 10:57
Run Duration329 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$385
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 95.4
1-Core 149
2-Core 299
100% 181 Pts
4-Core 600
8-Core 1,069
100% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,569
97% 1,569 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 457.30
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
185% Outstanding
Lighting 267
Reflection 256
Parallax 302
218% 275 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 246
Splatting 143
185% 239 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 185%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1657 1482 1473 1470 1475 1459 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
321% Outstanding
Read 2,506
Write 2307
Mixed 1,802
SusWrite 1,503
455% 2,029 MB/s
4K Read 58
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 79.4
262% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 1,133
DQ Write 988
DQ Mixed 1,067
798% 1,063 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 321%
Great: 410%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$122
68GB free
Firmware: 4B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,295
Write 1,847
Mixed 850
367% 1,664 MB/s
4K Read 46.9
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 66
225% 81.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,222
DQ Write 1,037
DQ Mixed 1,051
809% 1,103 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
59GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 486 255 163 163 149 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 488
Mixed 410
SusWrite 227
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 99.6
4K Mixed 57.1
190% 66.4 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 356
267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 109%
Great: 134%
Hitachi HUA722020ALA330 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: JKAOA3GG
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 122 122 121 122 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 117
Write 127
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 229 233 234 232 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 117%
PNY USB 3.1 FD 495GB
453GB free, PID 00d9
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 200 210 193 210 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 149
Write 78.2
Mixed 19.7
SusWrite 168
132% 104 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.3
81% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 029E CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 64GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 32.3
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 21.6
SC Write 44.1
SC Mixed 31.5
93% 32.4 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 102%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS MASTER-CF Builds (Compare 8,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS MASTER - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $1,114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback