Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics51.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel DH67BL
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120312
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '20 at 17:45
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$40
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
64% Good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 120
60% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 202
8-Core 234
28% 218 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 64%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$144
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.6% Above average
Lighting 63.1
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 59.5
51% 63 fps
MRender 62.7
Gravity 65.7
Splatting 62.2
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN256HMJP-00000 256GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV0100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 199 202 203 185 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 389
Write 378
Mixed 335
SusWrite 203
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 45
4K Mixed 31.1
102% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 41.1
DQ Write 117
DQ Mixed 56.6
50% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 124%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
930GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 102 101 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 108
Write 99.5
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 101
69% 94.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.5% Average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 14.7
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 10.2
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 62.8
64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,032 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback