Today's hottest deals

Asus P8H67-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H67-V  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 12:45
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 94.5
2-Core 184
72% 122 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 353
47% 354 Pts
64-Core 344
21% 344 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.7% Poor
Lighting 32.2
Reflection 33.3
Parallax 31.8
26% 32.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 32.7
Splatting 22.7
25% 31.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 116 109 31 132 44 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.9% Poor
Read 198
Write 84.8
Mixed 76.4
SusWrite 89.1
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 17.2
4K Mixed 9.8
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 15.8
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 12.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 85%
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 143 141 142 140 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 354
Write 348
Mixed 268
SusWrite 136
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 30.8
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 43.6
41% 60.1 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 117%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 143 141 142 140 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 151
Mixed 69.6
SusWrite 136
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29.2% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 9.5
MC Mixed 8.5
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.2 GB/s
Latency 69.7
57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H67-V Builds (Compare 410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $330
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback