PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 25.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H67-V (all builds) |
Memory | 4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '22 at 12:45 |
Run Duration | 211 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
|
74.5%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.7%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 116 109 31 132 44 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 143 141 142 140 MB/s
|
58.3%
Above average
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 134 143 141 142 140 MB/s
|
90.9%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
29.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 66x |
Core i5-2400Intel $40Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 60x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 46x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 29x |
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 26x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 17x |
SSD | |
---|---|
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples | 23x |
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples | 16x |
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $330 |