Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory15.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 09:20
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 30%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 63.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 262
82% 155 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 848
83% 679 Pts
64-Core 1,249
77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.8% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 60.7
51% 63.5 fps
MRender 60.3
Gravity 64.1
Splatting 60.5
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 545s Series 256GB-$79
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LHF002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 188 229 165 134 165 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 418
Write 394
Mixed 402
SusWrite 190
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 55.3
4K Mixed 34.6
120% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 151
126% 182 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 117%
Adata SX8200PNP 2TB
634GB free
Firmware: SS0411BB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1439 969 1181 938 983 976 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,177
Write 1,658
Mixed 138
SusWrite 1,081
280% 1,264 MB/s
4K Read 45.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 59.8
200% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,012
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 596
513% 765 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 253%
Great: 370%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 192 195 201 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 205
Write 161
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 195
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 114%
Great: 114%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 217 222 221 222 219 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE1 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.5% Good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 26.8
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 22.9
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,949 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $882
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback