Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 11 '22 at 15:06
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 76
1-Core 137
2-Core 271
87% 161 Pts
4-Core 506
8-Core 839
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,063
66% 1,063 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$270
Nvidia(10DE 1E82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 170
Parallax 174
137% 171 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 146
Splatting 123
121% 152 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 126%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team TM8FP4512G 512GB
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,480
Write 1,414
Mixed 700
266% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 42
202% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1,283
DQ Write 1,001
DQ Mixed 400
501% 895 MB/s
Poor: 134% Great: 286%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$234
66GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 489 484 481 478 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 490
Mixed 456
SusWrite 480
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 60.4
202% 72.1 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 350
269% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Adata SU630 480GB
60GB free
Firmware: V8X14c18
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 386 385 388 388 389 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
94% Outstanding
Read 381
Write 383
Mixed 343
SusWrite 386
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 97.3
4K Mixed 42.2
151% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 181
139% 188 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 94%
Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
72GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 118 117 117 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
63% Good
Read 104
Write 80.7
Mixed 70.6
SusWrite 116
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
6GB free
Firmware: 1003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 90.2
Write 91.8
Mixed 80.9
66% 87.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2D3600C18 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 26.8
MC Mixed 37.9
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 33.5
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING Builds (Compare 24,392 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX B450-F GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $500
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback