MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics18.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory26.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200109
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '20 at 18:32
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Memory 75.9
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
95% 178 Pts
4-Core 606
8-Core 1129
104% 867 Pts
64-Core 2,118
131% 2,118 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
PNY(196E 0871) 1.2GB
CLim: 732 MHz, MLim: 950 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Lighting 21.4
Reflection 36.1
Parallax 25.3
17% 27.6 fps
MRender 34.8
Gravity 19.7
Splatting 23
21% 25.8 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M Series NVMe SSD 1T 1TB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1346 1367 1392 1398 1399 1393 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,693
Write 1,343
Mixed 973
SusWrite 1,383
302% 1,348 MB/s
4K Read 54.9
4K Write 157
4K Mixed 46.1
225% 86 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 745
DQ Mixed 70.5
181% 366 MB/s
Poor: 141%
This bench: 242%
Great: 290%
WDC WD60EMAZ-51LW3B0 6TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 178 178 177 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 197
Write 166
Mixed 95.6
SusWrite 178
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 10.9
DQ Mixed 1.3
2% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 36%
Great: 36%
Hitachi HDN 726040ALE614 4TB
921GB free
Firmware: APGN
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 35.2
Write 35.5
Mixed 33.2
SusWrite 20
23% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
165% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 16%
Great: 110%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
582GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 20 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 34.1
Mixed 29.6
SusWrite 19.9
22% 29.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 87%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 249 237 248 251 253 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Toshiba HDWN180 8TB
1TB free
Firmware: GX2M
SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 203 199 202 198 204 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 198
Mixed 92.9
SusWrite 201
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 0.7
267% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 115%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS832A.C8FJ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
MC Read 39.6
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 36.3
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.1
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 33.2
76% 26.7 GB/s
Latency 88.6
45% 88.6 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $951
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback