Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	47.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161011
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '20 at 01:17
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	37%

PC Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	72.6% Very good	Memory 82.3 1-Core 139 2-Core 257 88% 160 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 377 49% 370 Pts	64-Core 444 28% 444 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 72.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 457.51 Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.8% Average	Lighting 69.2 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 62.9 56% 68.5 fps	MRender 63 Gravity 67.5 Splatting 0.2 31% 43.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WD10EZEX-60WN4A0 240GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 32 133 30 99 65 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 179 Write 95.7 Mixed 198 SusWrite 83.8 31% 139 MB/s	4K Read 21.1 4K Write 72.6 4K Mixed 26.2 104% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 117 114% 181 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 96%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 380GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 427 455 479 439 465 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 205 Mixed 390 SusWrite 440 84% 376 MB/s	4K Read 35.2 4K Write 71.6 4K Mixed 47.7 152% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 346 258% 343 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 129%
Kingston SA400S37240G 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 845GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 141 143 143 142 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 164 Write 158 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 142 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2197 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	57% Above average	MC Read 17.6 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 19.3 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 20.1 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 80%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	268x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	268x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	196x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	355x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	289x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	138x

Value: 70% - Very good

Total price: $1,202

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16