Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB2A
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180907
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 19 '20 at 22:43
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3520M
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 72.9
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 123
59% 96 Pts
4-Core 220
8-Core 235
30% 227 Pts
64-Core 235
14% 235 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C2) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.53% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.1
4% 3.13 fps
MRender 4.9
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5.3
4% 4.27 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.53%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-512-G2 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMP1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 407 256 185 228 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
46.3% Average
Read 200
Write 103
Mixed 84.8
SusWrite 292
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 11
49% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.3
DQ Write 244
DQ Mixed 228
147% 162 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 103%
Corsair CMFSSD-256D1 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: 2.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 155 159 160 160 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 207
Write 150
Mixed 116
SusWrite 158
35% 158 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 11.1
4K Mixed 13.5
59% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 61.4
DQ Write 11
DQ Mixed 14.3
16% 28.9 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Goodram GR1600S3V64L11/8G 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 17.7
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 94.8
42% 94.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK AH532 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK AH532

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback