Dell OptiPlex 7020

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7020
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7020  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJan 08 '21 at 15:25
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 101
2-Core 174
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 411
8-Core 405
55% 408 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450
Device(1B0A 909D) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
1.74% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 2
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2
Gravity 2
Splatting 2
2% 2 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.74%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
338GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 303 305 294 305 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 460
Write 403
Mixed 337
SusWrite 302
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 50.8
4K Mixed 28.8
96% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 85.5
DQ Mixed 151
131% 204 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: HP64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 123 118 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 119
Write 71.8
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 122
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 859B CT51264BA160BJ.C8F Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.7% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 18.2
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 20.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 7020 Builds (Compare 4,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7020

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $231
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback