Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1650 v2-$635 10,921 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Memory 82.8 1-Core 90.3 2-Core 191 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 378 8-Core 570 59% 474 Pts	64-Core 730 45% 730 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5000 3,775 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.50 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 23.7 Reflection 26 Parallax 31 19% 26.9 fps	MRender 35.4 Gravity 29.3 Splatting 0.2 15% 21.6 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 11 11 120 27 7.4 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.1% Poor	Read 158 Write 102 Mixed 85 SusWrite 73.5 23% 105 MB/s	4K Read 10.5 4K Write 16.5 4K Mixed 8.2 35% 11.7 MB/s	DQ Read 15.1 DQ Write 287 DQ Mixed 168 125% 157 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 100%
Crucial MTFDDAK512MAY-1A 512GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 67GB free Firmware: M504 SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 234 135 132 149 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	73.2% Very good	Read 354 Write 348 Mixed 264 SusWrite 192 65% 290 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 62.8 4K Mixed 30.6 103% 37.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 227 202% 304 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 73.2% Great: 95%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 600 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1GB free, PID b207 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32 Write 26.5 Mixed 20 32% 26.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B2G70DB0-CMA 6x16GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 6 of 8 slots used 96GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 44.6 MC Write 41 MC Mixed 40.4 120% 42 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 12 38% 13.2 GB/s	Latency 75.6 53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 105%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 01stBench 55%, 2,873 samples	155x
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	154x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	132x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	176x
Quadro K2000NvidiaBench 7%, 13,526 samples	114x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	97x

SSD
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	72x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	68x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	61x

RAM
9965525-138.A00LF 12x8GBKingstonBench 111%, 25 samples	24x
18JDF1G72PZ-1G6E1 8x8GBMicronBench 98%, 24 samples	21x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 83%, 405 samples	18x