Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 181% UFO	Desktop 102% UFO	Workstation 204% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	176% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	53.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	28 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210113
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 17 '21 at 03:58
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Memory 91.1 1-Core 165 2-Core 324 104% 193 Pts	4-Core 636 8-Core 1,253 112% 945 Pts	64-Core 2,250 139% 2,250 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% Nvidia(10DE 1467) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 461.09 Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	176% Outstanding	Lighting 253 Reflection 225 Parallax 254 206% 244 fps	MRender 287 Gravity 212 Splatting 157 172% 218 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 176% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 63 52 53 54 54 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 404 Write 64.3 Mixed 131 SusWrite 55.9 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 22.1 94% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 173 DQ Write 61.9 DQ Mixed 87.1 72% 107 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 121%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 160GB free Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 224 297 225 267 256 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42% Average	Read 273 Write 97.5 Mixed 87.6 SusWrite 261 40% 180 MB/s	4K Read 15 4K Write 20.4 4K Mixed 11.2 48% 15.5 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 15 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-4000 2x16GB 438 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	134% Outstanding	MC Read 64.6 MC Write 47.4 MC Mixed 39.8 145% 50.6 GB/s	SC Read 28.9 SC Write 26.6 SC Mixed 40.3 91% 31.9 GB/s	Latency 65.6 61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 134% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $192

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,652x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,264x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,416x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,239x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,077x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,471x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,836x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	867x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	771x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	726x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16