Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics67.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200716
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 21 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 76.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 230
79% 142 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 756
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.7% Good
Lighting 91.9
Reflection 89
Parallax 75.2
75% 85.4 fps
MRender 63.9
Gravity 75
Splatting 60.3
54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Boss-S325S/128G 128GB
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 171 113 81 115 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
Read 472
Write 335
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 135
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 4.1
59% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 72.9
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 0.9
58% 133 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 75%
TPH01001000GB30 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: GKAOA94A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 82 82 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 81
Write 85.2
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 82.6
54% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer APS-M4AGU0N26J-GHA 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 16
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 762 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback