Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 31 '21 at 07:20
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7167U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.9% Average
Memory 56
1-Core 51.3
2-Core 46.5
36% 51.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 155
24% 173 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus 650 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9168
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.1
4% 4.7 fps
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 5.6
5% 5.75 fps
Poor: 6% Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSNH256GMCT 253GB
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: THSA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 194 202 281 269 261 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 320
Write 249
Mixed 238
SusWrite 238
59% 261 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 19.3
68% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 236
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 143
124% 185 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 90%
Crucial MX100 512GB-$200
314GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 236 235 384 417 411 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 332
Write 368
Mixed 241
SusWrite 328
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 17.3
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 24.7
96% 38.1 MB/s
DQ Read 128
DQ Write 249
DQ Mixed 156
128% 178 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-435.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 41.1
MC Mixed 17.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 14.9
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 140
29% 140 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 15,192 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback