Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '21 at 15:08
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 196
66% 120 Pts
4-Core 345
8-Core 543
55% 444 Pts
64-Core 541
34% 541 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 3679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.7% Average
Lighting 49.1
Reflection 98.4
Parallax 56
40% 67.8 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 55.7
Splatting 54
48% 59.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.T Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 469 239 257 241 240 352 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
121% Outstanding
Read 712
Write 595
Mixed 677
SusWrite 300
128% 571 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 84.7
4K Mixed 46.1
155% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 698
DQ Write 484
DQ Mixed 496
396% 559 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 121%
Great: 141%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
267GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 100 99 99 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 89.8
Write 97.5
Mixed 64.6
SusWrite 99
65% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
65GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 7 16 24 7.6 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
8.18% Terrible
Read 24.1
Write 9.2
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 11.4
18% 14.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
48% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 2133 C15 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
79.8% Very good
MC Read 30.7
MC Write 29.8
MC Mixed 26.9
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 29
SC Mixed 23.4
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 133% - Outstanding Total price: $293
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback