Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC6i5SYB
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160409
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '21 at 22:58
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6260U
CPU1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
62.1% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 82.1
2-Core 119
61% 96 Pts
4-Core 216
8-Core 230
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 226
14% 226 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Graphics 540
Intel(8086 2063) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 9.8
Reflection 8.8
Parallax 11.2
8% 9.93 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 0.1
3% 4.4 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SM2280S3G2240G 240GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.R
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 248 215 243 249 196 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 405
Write 305
Mixed 294
SusWrite 222
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 67.8
4K Mixed 32.5
118% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 146
140% 218 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 97%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
47GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 382 316 315 315 315 314 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 489
Write 451
Mixed 361
SusWrite 326
91% 407 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 84.1
4K Mixed 49.3
165% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 373
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 340
256% 343 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB
875GB free, PID 1019
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 39 38 39 39 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 36.2
Write 35.8
Mixed 30
SusWrite 38
48% 35 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
98% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.5% Good
MC Read 14
MC Write 44.9
MC Mixed 12.5
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 11.6
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,001 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback