Asus Z77-A

Performance Results


Gaming 15% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 12% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	14.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus Z77-A (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130823
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '21 at 21:54
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	70% Good	Memory 86.4 1-Core 79.2 2-Core 164 65% 110 Pts	4-Core 324 8-Core 249 40% 286 Pts	64-Core 329 20% 329 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 70% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Asus(1043 84F0) 2GB CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 460.79 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Lighting 17.3 Reflection 20.1 Parallax 13.7 14% 17 fps	MRender 23.2 Gravity 19.4 Splatting 16 16% 19.5 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 60GB-$76 24,219 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 72 71 75 74 64 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	47% Average	Read 226 Write 78.9 Mixed 116 SusWrite 71.9 27% 123 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 46.6 4K Mixed 27.6 94% 32.2 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 80.1 DQ Mixed 90 69% 95.1 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 69%
Samsung HD161HJ 160GB-$40 22,667 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 77GB free Firmware: JF100-19 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 61 63 62 62 62 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	35.8% Below average	Read 62.7 Write 57.7 Mixed 40.7 SusWrite 61.9 41% 55.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 35.8% Great: 42%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 1GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 8.3 8.7 8.1 9.7 8.4 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 30.8 Write 7.2 Mixed 10 SusWrite 7.5 15% 13.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 3 195% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905474-057.A00LF 8GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.7 48% 16.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 15.1 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z77-A Builds (Compare 491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Z77-A - $144

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	112x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	74x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	72x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	43x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	28x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	21x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	14x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	11x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	9x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $580

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16