ADD TO PC
BUILD

CKE PowerServer X-series

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	30.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	CKE PowerServer X-series (all builds)
Motherboard	Supermicro X9SRA/X9SRA-3
Memory	21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201101
Uptime	19.8 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '21 at 14:27
Run Duration	349 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2660 0 1,318 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62% Good	Memory 72.8 1-Core 54.4 2-Core 110 49% 79.2 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 509 47% 393 Pts	64-Core 705 44% 705 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 71%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 17 30 21 26 43 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 418 Write 51.3 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 27.6 29% 136 MB/s	4K Read 14.6 4K Write 8.5 4K Mixed 8.6 38% 10.6 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 8.3 DQ Mixed 10.6 10% 17.6 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 56%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 396GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 458 460 459 460 460 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	165% Outstanding	Read 1,791 Write 510 Mixed 958 SusWrite 459 204% 930 MB/s	4K Read 76.7 4K Write 30.4 4K Mixed 39.5 183% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 295 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 197 160% 228 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 165% Great: 165%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 124% 927GB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 454 455 455 456 456 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	164% Outstanding	Read 1,779 Write 504 Mixed 844 SusWrite 455 197% 896 MB/s	4K Read 77.7 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 38.7 183% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 287 DQ Write 192 DQ Mixed 194 157% 225 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 164% Great: 165%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 13,833 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 80GB free Firmware: MJ8OA5F0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 140 140 140 140 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 133 Write 141 Mixed 75.3 SusWrite 140 90% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 89%
WL4000GSA6472B 4TB 111 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 35GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 92 94 94 94 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	69.7% Good	Read 150 Write 148 Mixed 81.4 SusWrite 92.7 87% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 96%
Seagate Expansion+ 4TB 2,051 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 116 116 114 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	53.5% Above average	Read 70.6 Write 110 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 115 69% 92.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 0.6 175% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 53.5% Great: 68%
WD Red 6TB (2019)-$129 374 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 190 194 192 194 192 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 97%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 37 35 39 37 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 199 Write 21.6 Mixed 38.4 SusWrite 36.3 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 228% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 68%
IBM ServeRAID M5015 6TB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 2TB free Firmware: 2.13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 194 192 165 112 135 MB/s Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 691 Write 39.1 Mixed 175 SusWrite 165 196% 268 MB/s	4K Read 49 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 6.3 2,842% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 250%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70CH0- 4x8GB 322 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	89.9% Excellent	MC Read 38.5 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 34 104% 36.3 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 8.8 29% 10.3 GB/s	Latency 95.1 42% 95.1 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 89.9% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback